Here's a finding that should change how we think about code ownership:
</span></span><span style="display:flex"><span> <span style="color:#f92672">CODER_EXTERNAL_AUTH_0_CLIENT_ID</span>: <span style="color:#e6db74">"${CODER_EXTERNAL_AUTH_0_CLIENT_ID}"</span>
，这一点在搜狗输入法下载中也有详细论述
XSS attacks (and other injections) are only dangerous if they get past the candy-floss security of front-end validation. The browser, after all, isn't real and can't hurt you. However, if we assume that the front-end programmers spoke to the back-end programmers and share ideas about valid input, weak front-end validation may reflect back-end validation. If the programmers took the Node bait and wrote their front-ends and back-ends in the same language they may even reuse the same regex for validation on both ends.
Then we have to look at the phase. There are several possible ways to efficiently implement a test on a large number of cases; I covered one in my grimoire of 8-bit Implementation Patterns. That one relied on a jump table and could hit all targets in the same amount of time. I decided not to go with that one here, because only one of our targets is really time-critical and enough are similar that we can simply do a chain of if/else statements and still be fine.