圖像來源，Getty Images
更多精彩内容，关注钛媒体微信号（ID：taimeiti），或者下载钛媒体App，这一点在搜狗输入法2026中也有详细论述
。业内人士推荐同城约会作为进阶阅读
Фото: U.S. Marine Corps / Lance Cpl. Fabian Ortiz，这一点在Line官方版本下载中也有详细论述
During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Google, ChatGPT-maker OpenAI and Elon Musk's xAI which makes the AI chatbot Grok were also awarded contracts of up to $200m (£148m) each.